As you are aware, not many republicans are happy with the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act / Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, but unbeknownst to many of you, it has actually helped save hundreds of lives already. Patients with cancer or other pre-existing conditions are now being seen, when they were never given the opportunity to begin with. Hell, Ron Paul is telling us we need to find a local church that can offer us healthcare assistance. As if churches could give every American money. If that was the case we would all be going to church on Sundays.
We will go back to "Obamacare," as Republicans like to call it, at a later time. For now let's focus on WTF-4...
WTF-4
Requiring large employers to contribute to a national health plan. - During the campaign, President Barack Obama said that large employers would have to offer their workers health insurance or contribute toward the costs of a national plan. This type of requirement is usually called an employer mandate. But the final version of the health care law requires a contribution from employers, but it's not a straightforward mandate. Instead, the law states that large employers have to pay fines if any of their workers qualify for public subsidies. [Reference]
WTF-5
Requiring insurance companies to cover pre-existing conditions. - Requiring insurance companies to accept people with pre-existing conditions is one of the cornerstones of the health care reform bill passed by Congress and signed by President Barack Obama on March 23, 2010.The issue is addressed in Section 2704 of the bill, which states very clearly, "A group health plan and a health insurance issuer offering group or individual health insurance coverage may not impose any pre-existing condition exclusion with respect to such plan."
And Section 2705 spells the prohibition out in even more detail:
"A group health plan and a health insurance issuer offering group or individual health insurance coverage may not establish rules for eligibility (including continued eligibility) of any individual to enroll under the terms of the plan or coverage based on any of the following health status-related factors in relation to the individual or a dependent of the individual: health status; medical condition (including both physical and mental illnesses); claims experience; receipt of health care; medical history; genetic information; evidence of insurability (including conditions arising out of acts of domestic violence); disability; any other health status-related factor determined appropriate by the Secretary." [Reference 1, Reference 2]
WTF-6
Requiring health plans to disclose how much of the premium goes to patient care. - Under section 2718, health insurance providers are required to report how much they spend on payments for clinical coverage, activities that improve health care quality, and "all other non-claims costs." The provider must also include an explanation of the nature of these costs. The law mandates that the information be available on the Department of Health and Human Services website.Starting in 2011, companies that provide insurance for the small group and individual market must issue rebates if they do not spend at least 80 percent of the premium revenue on medical care. For the large group market, the threshold is 85 percent. The rebate amount is based on the premium revenue and by how much the provider falls short of the prescribed thresholds.
We wanted to point out this additional proof that President Obama kept his promise. The rating remains unchanged. [Reference]
Please make sure to read Issue No. 002 tomorrow as I continue with
WTF-7
WTF-7
7 comments:
I agree with idea that looking for healthcare assistance in churches is unrealistic, but I agree with the theory. First of all, nothing in this life is free(and yes, I realize that the majority of Americans who pay taxes do not even want to be further burdened with more taxes for a law that could give free healthcare to anybody, even if they don't work). We need to repeal the whole system apart, start afresh, and come out with a less burdening (and definetively with less govt involvement) that will keep many satisfied. It's not going to be an easy road, but we will be able to work out something somehow.
Americans will not be paying more taxes to get healthcare, but I do agree with most of your comment. There could be parts that can be amended. The likelihood of it being completely revamped is not too great, because the house is split and so is the senate. Furthermore, we can't strip people who are already receiving care, ie. those patients we care for here that have cancer who rely on this healthcare reform act. The supreme court will rule on this over the summer after they go through the whole thing in March. They may take some parts out, but a majority is good for the average American.
While I respect your views on Ron Paul, I don't really care for the man.
True. I may be a libertarian, but I also have a heart.
To be honest with you, I would have preferred Gary Johnson over Ron Paul as the Libertarian GOP contender, but he is right about ending the drug war, strengthening our defense WITHIN OUR BORDERS, and repealing the Patriot Act. I think the govt has stepped in way too much into the private lives of individuals.
Thanks for commenting Jesus. Remember if you find something that is not true in any of my WTFs, please feel free to let me know.
Nah, I don't find any of this to be false; I'm just sharing my views on an alternative solution on the Healthcare program.
Post a Comment